In an interesting turn of events, Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) parliamentary candidate who lost in the recent party primary elections Kabal Jacobs has chickened out in his endeavour to challenge President Mokgweetsi Masisi’s legitimacy as party president.
Kabal through his attorney Kagisano Tamocha this week shockingly told a packed court gallery minutes into the arguments section that he is withdrawing the two cases being main case questioning Masisi’s legitimacy and the other one asking for former president Lt. Gen. Seretse Khama Ian Khama to enjoin them as the 7th respondent.
Khama was expected to testify to court on whether he did resign as BDP president and therefore opening a vacancy to be filled by his then Vice president Mokgweetsi Masisi or not. Masisi has since became the state president and it is still not clear whether he became the party leader too. When presenting the Khama enjoiner proposal, the lawyer asked court to postpone the matter to allow for consultation with Khama to physically come to court to testify against Masisi and BDP or at least pen an affidavit in support of his application questioning Masisi’s legitimacy as party president.
“It is in this light, that Jacobs enjoined Khama in the matter to testify against the party and clarify if he ever resigned and therefore still party president. My client is not saying Masisi is not the president of the BDP but that we want clarity as to who is the president, that’s all,” Jacobs’s attorney told Weekend Post outside court.
He continued to state that they only want the court to assist interpret the BDP constitution on the party presidency which is in dispute while adding that they contend that former state president Khama did not resign his position as party president and therefore he still holds the position. “We have never been in contact with Khama to enjoin in the matter but we thought his coming in would assist tell the court with regard to whether he resigned or not because the presidency of Masisi can only come where there is a vacancy. When there is a vacancy the VP takes over as party president. We believe the last president to be elected party president was and still is Khama at Ave Maria during a party congress in Gaborone,” Tamocha observed.
He further said that Khama didn’t refuse to come to court but he never had the opportunity to be invited to testify. However Jacobs lawyer asked Justice Christopher Gabanagae to postpone the matter to allow for Khama to be enjoined, he briefly and out rightly ruled against the application. “So the refusal to enjoin Khama in the case by the judge Chris Gabanagae then killed everything together,” Tamocha highlighted. He was also worried that the application was objected to by the Judge without giving Khama an opportunity to state whether he would like to be enjoined into the proceedings or not.
According to Jacobs lawyer, they also believed that Masisi would either have to withdraw his immunity under section 41 of the country’s constitution to allow for a proper determination of the question brought forth in relation to the presidency of the BDP. He said this bearing in mind that one of their prayers to court were seeking that the sitting of Committees of the Central Committee including the Committee headed by the 4th respondent (Peter Siele) in terms of article 33 of the constitution of the 1st respondent, and the appeals committee is not proper because they have not been appointed by a substantive president, whom they believe it should have been Khama and not Masisi.
“This was one of our strongest points for our case. But the tactic didn’t work for Khama to enjoin as it was prematurely dismissed.” When opposing Jacobs' request for a postponement, BDP lawyer Basimane Bogopa of Bogopa, Manewe, Tobedza and Company said Jacobs had known all along that Khama was integral to his case. And therefore should have made his mind on whether to continue with the case or not and not delay case just to withdraw at last minute.
His partner, Busang Manewe also pointed out that Jacobs and his lawyer did not get proper advice as they have all known that the president of country cannot be sued both in his official and private capacity which include as acting as BDP president per section 41 (1) of the constitution of Botswana. The BDP submitted that the case be dismissed and costs be awarded Jacobs. However he promised that the case will be re-instituted next week and will come back stronger and with a more solid points in the case.
In the matter BDP was cited as the 1st respondent, 2nd respondent being President Dr Mokgweetsi Masisi while the 3rd is Peter Siele on his capacity as BDP Electoral board chairperson. The 4th respondent is Kingsley Sebele the appeal’s board chairperson, and the 5th is the regional chairperson for BDP Southern region while Thapelo Matsheka the Lobatse MP elect is the 6th respondent with Khama enjoined in lately as the 7th respondent.
The election for the BDP parliamentary candidate in Lobatse was contested by Matsheka who garnered 1,376 votes, the incumbent Lobatse legislator Sadique Kebonang only got 1,073 votes while Jacobs amassed only 1,219 votes. Another candidate Lone Bome attained 66 votes, Patrick Kebailele got 218 and Ahmed Shabeer Ishmail only attained 317 votes cast. Meanwhile Jacobs has vowed to bounce back with a fresh application on urgent basis again next week featuring former President Khama as his key witness.
Individuals challenged by disabilities encounter formidable obstacles when endeavoring to partake in political processes within the context of Botswana. Political involvement, a cornerstone of democratic governance, empowers citizens to shape the legislative landscape that impacts their daily existence. Despite Botswana’s reputation for upholding democratic ideals, recent insights unveil a troubling reality – those with disabilities find themselves marginalized in the realm of politics, contending with substantial barriers obstructing the exercise of their democratic liberties.
A recent inquiry in Botswana unveiled a panorama where individuals with disabilities confront hurdles in navigating the political arena, their involvement often restricted to the basic act of voting. Voices emerged from the study, underscoring the critical necessity of fostering environments that are accessible and welcoming, affording individuals with disabilities the active engagement they rightfully deserve in political processes. Noteworthy was the account of a participant grappling with physical impairments, shedding light on the glaring absence of ramps at polling stations and the urgent call for enhanced support mechanisms to ensure an equitable electoral participation.
The echoes reverberating from these narratives serve as poignant reminders of the entrenched obstacles impeding the full integration of individuals with disabilities into the democratic tapestry. The inaccessibility of polling stations and the glaring absence of provisions tailored to the needs of persons with disabilities loom large as formidable barricades to their political engagement. Particularly pronounced is the plight of those grappling with severe impairments and intellectual challenges, who face even steeper hurdles in seizing political participation opportunities, often grappling with feelings of isolation and exclusion from the political discourse.
Calls for decisive action cascade forth, urging the establishment of more inclusive and accessible political ecosystems that embrace individuals with disabilities in Botswana. Government bodies and concerned stakeholders are urged to prioritize the enactment of laws and policies designed to safeguard the political rights of individuals with disabilities. Furthermore, initiatives geared towards enhancing awareness and education on political processes and rights for this segment of society must be spearheaded, alongside the adoption of inclusive measures within political institutions and party structures.
By dismantling these barriers and nurturing a political landscape that is truly inclusive, Botswana can earnestly uphold its democratic ethos and afford every citizen, including those with disabilities, a substantive opportunity to partake in the political fabric of the nation.
In the heartwarming tale of Neo Kirchway, a beacon of inspiration emerges, shining brightly amid life’s adversities.
Defying the constraints of destiny, Neo Kirchway, a resilient Motswana soul now thriving in the United States, stands tall despite the absence of her lower limbs. With unwavering determination, she tends to her cherished family – a loving husband and four children – engaging in the daily symphony of household tasks with remarkable grace.
Neo’s indomitable spirit traces back to the fateful year of 1994, a time when medical intervention called for the amputation of her curled legs. Embracing this pivotal juncture with unwavering courage and the blessing of her mother, she ventured forth into a world adorned with prosthetic legs, eager to script a tale of triumph.
Venturing beyond borders, Neo’s journey led her to the embrace of the United States, where serendipity intertwined her fate with that of her soulmate, Garrett Kirchway. Together, this harmonious duo navigates the ebbs and flows of life, their bond fortified by unwavering love and unyielding support.
In a bid to illuminate paths and embolden hearts, Neo leverages the digital realm, crafting a sanctuary of empowerment on her YouTube channel. Brimming with authenticity and raw emotion, her videos chronicle the tapestry of her daily life, serving as a testament to resilience and the unwavering human spirit.
Amidst the digital cosmos, Neo, affectionately known as “KirchBaby,” reigns supreme, a luminary in the hearts of 658,000 enraptured subscribers. Through her captivating content, she not only navigates the mundane tasks of cooking, cleaning, and childcare but also dances with celestial grace, a testament to her boundless spirit and unyielding zest for life.
In the cathedral of Neo Kirchway’s narrative, resilience reigns supreme, echoing a universal truth – that amidst life’s gales, the human spirit, when kindled by hope and fortitude, emerges as a beacon of light, illuminating even the darkest of paths.
The government’s efforts to integrate individuals with disabilities in Botswana society are being hampered by budgetary constraints. Those with disabilities face inequalities in budgetary allocations in the health and education sectors. For instance, it is reported that the government allocates higher budgetary funds to the general health sector, while marginal allocations are proposed for the development and implementation of the National Primary Health Care guidelines and Standards for those with Disabilities. This shows that in terms of budgetary solutions, the government’s proposed initiatives in improving the health and well-being of those with disabilities remain futile as there is not enough money going towards disability-specific health programs. On the other hand, limited budgetary allocations to the Special Education Unit also are a primary contributor to the inequalities faced by children with disabilities. The government only provides for the employment of 15 teachers with qualifications in special education despite the large numbers of children with intellectual disabilities that are in need of special education throughout Botswana. Such disproportional allocation of resources inhibits the capacity to provide affordable and accessible assisted technology and residential support services for those with disabilities. Given the fact that a different amount of resources have been availed to the education and health sectors, the general understanding is that the government is not doing enough to ensure that adequate resources are distributed to disability-specific programs and facilities such as barrier-free environments, residential homes, and special education schools for children with disabilities.