1. The above captioned matter bears substantive reference.
2. I write on behalf of former BCL employees, Phikwe residents in general and Phikwe West constituents in particular. I’ve written a letter to the President of the Republic titled “the Town of Selibe-Phikwe and BCL Mine Reopening issues” dated 21st August 2018, the same hasn’t been replied by Office of the President. Please also refer to that letter.
3. I’ve raised this issue in various Parliament debates, questions, themes and motions and Bills (e.g. Appropriation Bills).
4. You are fully appraised on BCL liquidation issues and I assume you’ve all the details, I will therefore not belabor the point.
5. I have raised the following complaints about BCL and equally offered solutions:
5.1. That the mine shouldn’t have been closed/operations ceased and placed under liquidation, it ought to have been restructured and recapitalized or put under judicial management and that it should be open forthwith in light of the rising copper and nickel prices in the international market.
5.2. That former BCL employees should have been paid adequate compensation equivalent to at least retrenchment packages to deal with their abrupt loss of Jobs and consequent socio-economic upset.
5.3. That the liquidation process only serves to extract from the taxpayer with no clear and tangible returns, that I’ve received worrying Care and Maintenance reports suggesting that the nation’s assets at BCL are not properly taken cared for e.g. reports of shafts flooding, problems with lighting or electricity and air circulation and or occupational health and safety concerns. I’ve suggested immediate removal of the BCL Liquidator and the transfer of Care and Maintenance into a government entity set up for same or an already existing public vehicle such as MDCB. I was also informed, in part by you, that the Director of Mines has invoked his powers under the Mine, Quarries, Works and Machinery Act to intervene and that there wasn’t cooperation from the liquidator.
5.4. That Government should not evict former BCL employees residing in the mine houses until the mine reopens and that government should ensure that the liquidator doesn’t effect evictions. The ex-miners have petitioned your government through the District Commissioner’s Office in Phikwe on their desire to continue staying in BCL houses.
6. You’ve told Parliament that the relationship between your government and the liquidator has broken down irretrievably, you’ve implicitly and explicitly stated that the liquidator has been uncooperative, deceptive, unreasonable and hasn’t taken proper and adequate care of the mine assets and that you have initiated a process through the Attorney General to have him legally removed.
7. I have informed you through our verbal, telephonic and Whatsaap communication as well as our Parliamentary exchanges that the Liquidator has written letters to former BCL employees residing in the company houses informing them that end of January 2019 the House leases will expire or terminate, that they will have to vacate the houses and that those wishing to continue staying beyond the lease expiry will have to pay rent. Some former miners have vacated the houses to avert a catastrophe of abrupt evictions.
7.1. You and I agreed in principle that the aforementioned scenario proposed by the liquidator is untenable and undesirable.
7.2. The Liquidator has informed me that government hasn’t paid rent for former miners or words to that effect, that the agreement with government on the former miners stay is supposed to be financially supported by the government.
7.3. The liquidator alleges serious financial sabotage by your office in what he describes as a systematic refusal to fund ex-miners’ stay in BCL houses, he views this posture by your government as a ploy to frustrate him out of his job he is assigned by the High Court on your recommendation.
8. The undesirable results of the Liquidator’s housing decree taking effect are most likely to be inter alia:
8.1. It will result in mass exodus of people from the town of Selebi-Phikwe, consequently the Town will be desolate and or become a ghost town. This will exacerbate the already degraded socio-economic conditions.
8.2. The vacant houses will be vandalized, valuables stolen from the properties and will undoubtedly become havens for criminals, the Town will become too dangerous.
8.3. It has become clear from the Liquidator that institutions such as BDF, Police, SPTC, government departments and other possible group and individual tenants may not occupy the BCL houses because anytime an investor may buy the mine and operate it and need the houses thereby disrupting whoever is staying in these houses. It would appear that this is what deters institutions and individuals from occupying these residential properties. No one seems to be ready to sign a lease that states “you can be removed any day if the need arises”. This therefore means the houses are likely to be vacant with no new tenants following the execution of the liquidator’s order.
8.4. The list of rental prices for BCL residential properties was circulated by the liquidator and clearly they are exorbitant by both Botswana and Phikwe standards. The feedback to the MPs office is that these prices are exorbitantly unaffordable to many Batswana and institutions of government.
8.5. Some houses have been vacant from the day the mine closed, some have been vandalized and are getting dilapidated. What would happen if more houses become vacant? More are becoming vacant daily.
8.6. The disruption on the teaching and learning will be enormous; learners will have to be transferred en masse with deleterious consequences.
8.7. Public Health repercussions cannot be discounted; patients on various treatments for chronic conditions and diseases, former miners who are being treated for injuries, the environmental health and other health related issues are anticipated.
8.8. There is likely to be demographic distortions or upsets if the housing decree is effected.
9. I pleaded, I’m pleading and will continue to plead with your good Ministry to intervene in this matter by:
9.1. Preventing the liquidator from executing his eviction of former BCL employees from the houses and or rescinding his decision to terminate leases and or levy rent from the former miners. This can be done in different ways; negotiating with the liquidator whilst his removal is being pursued in Court; or moving an urgent application arguing that the eviction will result in the decline of the property value and or that it is not a prudent decision as far as safeguarding the properties is concerned; or by expediting the firing of the liquidator and transferring the assets to a government entity as I have suggested. Alternative relief can be sought in Court with similar objectives.
9.2. Please Find a way of making sure that the already vacant houses are occupied to safeguard their value and or status.
10. I plead with you to end BCL liquidation by transferring care and maintenance into a government entity and to forthwith work on reopening of the mine for job creation and resuscitation of the town’s economy.
10.1. The liquidator estimates the environment liability (rehabilitation) to be around P 2.8 billion. I suggest that the government set up a BCL Environmental Rehabilitation Liability Trust and put the above stated amount in it for same, royalties and taxes at the agreed amount should also go into this trust, this will serve as an incentive for investors…i.e. investors are deterred by this exorbitant rehabilitation liability which renders them unable to buy and operate the mine.
10.2. The government should provide other incentives to lure investors.
10.3 Copper and Nickel are selling at high prices in the international market, predictions by market observers are good primarily because of the advent of electric and hybrid cars, construction in China and other demands elsewhere. That’s why the reopening is imperative.
11. Please treat this mater as urgent. Your cooperation will be appreciated. Sir I am available for a meeting to discuss this important matter at your convenience.
Yours faithfully Dithapelo Lefoko Keorapetse MP, Selebi-Phikwe West
This is a question that should seriously exercise the mind of every Botswana citizen and every science researcher, every health worker and every political leader political.
The Covid-19 currently defines our lives and poses a direct threat to every aspect and every part of national safety, security and general well-being. This disease has become a normative part of human life throughout the world.
The first part of the struggle against the murderous depredation of this disease was to protect personal life through restrictive health injunctions and protocols; the worst possibly being human isolation and masks that hid our sorrows and lamentations through thin veils. We suffered that humiliation with grace and I believe as a nation we did a great job.
Now the vaccines are here, ushering us into the second phase of this war against the plague; and we are asking ourselves, is this science-driven fight against Covid-19 spell the end of pandemic anxiety? Is the health nightmare coming to an end? What happy lives lie ahead? Is this the time for celebration or caution? As the Non State Actors, we have being struggling with these questions for months.
We have published our thoughts and feelings, and our research reviews and thorough reading of both the local and international impacts of this rampaging viral invasion in local newspapers and social media platforms.
More significantly, we have successfully organised workshops about the impact of the pandemic on society and the economy and the last workshop invited a panel of health experts, professionals, and public administers to advance this social dialogue as part of our commitment to the tripartite engagement we enjoy working with Government of Botswana, Civil Society and Development partners. These workshops are virtual and open to all Batswana, foreign diplomatic missions based in Gaborone, UN agencies located in Gaborone and international academic researchers and professional health experts and specialists.
The mark of Covid-19 on our nation is a painful one, a tragedy shared by the entire human race, but still a contextually painful experience. Our response is fraught with grave difficulties; limited resources, limited time, and the urgency to not only save lives but also avert economic ruin and a bleak future for all who survive. Several vaccines are already in the market.
Parts of the world are already doing the best they can to trunk the pestilential march of this disease by rolling out mass-vaccinations campaigns that promise to evict this health menace and nightmare from their public lives. Botswana, like much of Africa, is still up in the disreputable, and, unenviable, preventative social melee of masked interactions, metered distances, contactless commerce.
We remain very much at the mercy of a marauding virus that daily runs amuck with earth shattering implications for the economy and human lives. And the battle against both infections and transmissions is proving to be difficult, in terms of finance, institutional capacities and resource mobilization. How are we prepared as government, and as citizens, to embrace the impending mass-vaccinations? What are the chances of us succeeding at this last-ditch effort to defeat the virus? What are the most pressing obstacles?
Does the work of vaccines spell an end to the pandemic anxieties?
Our panellists addressed the current state of mass-vaccination preparedness at the Botswana national level. What resources are available? What are the financial, institutional and administrative operational challenges (costs and supply chains, delivery, distribution, administering the vaccine on time, surveillance and security of vaccines?) What is being done to overcome them, or what can be done to overcome them? What do public assessments of preparedness tell us at the local community levels? How strong is the political will and direction? How long can we expect the whole exercise to last? At what point should we start seeing tangible results of the mass-vaccination campaign?
They also addressed the challenges of the anticipated emerging Vaccinated Society. How to fight the myths of vaccines and the superstitions about histories of human immunizations? What exactly is being done to grow robust local confidence in the science of vaccinations and the vaccines themselves? More significantly, how to square these campaigns vis-vis personal rights, moral/religious obligations?
What messages are being sent out in these regards and how are Batswana responding? What about issues of justice and equality? Will we get the necessary vaccines to everyone who wants them? What is being done to ensure no deserving person is left behind?
They also addressed issues of health data. To accomplish this mass-vaccination campaign and do everything right we need accurate and complete data. Poor data already makes it very hard to just cope with the disease. What is being done to improve data for the mass-vaccination campaign? How is this data being collected, aggregated and prepared for real life situation/applications throughout Botswana in the coming campaign?
We know in America, for example, general reporting and treatment of health data at the beginning of vaccinations was so poor, so chaotic and so scattered mainstream newspapers like The Atlantic, Washington Post and the New York Times had to step in, working very closely with civil society organizations, to rescue the situation. What data-related issues are still problematic in Botswana?
To be specific, what kind of Covid-19 data is being taken now to ready the whole country for an effective and efficient mass-vaccination program?
Batswana must be made aware that the end part of vaccination will just mark the beginning of a long journey to health recovery and national redemption; that in many ways Covid-19 vaccination is just another step toward the many efforts in abeyance to fight this health pandemic, the road ahead is still long and painful.
For this purpose, and to highlight the significance of this observation we tasked our panellists with the arduous imperative of analysing the impact of mass-vaccination on society and the economy alongside the pressing issues of post-Covid-19 national health surveillance and rehabilitation programs.
Research suggests the aftermath of Covid-19 vaccination is going to be just as difficult and uncertain world as the present reality in many ways, and that caution should prevail over celebration, at least for a long time. The disease itself is projected to linger around for some time after all these mass-vaccination campaigns unless an effort is made to vaccinate everyone to the last reported case, every nation succeeds beyond herd immunity, and cure is found for Covid-19 disease. Many people are going to continue in need of medications, psychological and psychiatric services and therapy.
Is Botswana ready for this long holdout? If not, what path should we take going into the future? The Second concern is , are we going to have a single, trusted national agency charged with the mandate to set standards for our national health data system, now that we know how real bad pandemics can be, and the value of data in quickly responding to them and mitigating impact? Finally, what is being done to curate a short history of this pandemic? A national museum of health and medicine or a Public Health Institute in Botswana is overdue.
If we are to create strong sets of data policies and data quality standards for fighting future health pandemics it is critical that they find ideological and moral foundations in the artistic imagery and photography of the present human experience…context is essential to fighting such diseases, and to be prepared we must learn from every tragic health incident.
Our panellists answered most of these questions with distinguished intellectual clarity. We wish Batswana to join us in our second Mass-vaccination workshop.
Today is International Women’s Day – it’s a moment to think about how much better our news diet could be if inequities were eliminated. In 1995, when the curtains fell in one of the largest meetings that have ever brought women together to discuss women in development, it was noted that women and media remain key to development.
Twenty-six years later, the relevant “Article J” of the Beijing Platform for Action, remains unfulfilled. Its two strategic objectives with regard to Women and Media have not been met. They are Increase the participation and access of women to expression and decision-making in and through the media and new technologies of communication
Promote a balanced and non-stereotyped portrayal of women in the media.
Today, as we mark International Women’s Day, it’s an indictment on both media owners and civil society that women remain on the periphery of news-making. They cannot claim equal space in either the structures of newsrooms or in the content produced, be that as sources of news or as the subjects of reports. Indeed, the latest figures from WAN-IFRA’s Women in News Programme show just one in five voices in news belong to women*, be they as sources, as the author or as the main character of the news report.
Some progress was evident several years back, with stand-out women being named as chief executive officers, editors in chief, managing editors and executive editors. But these gains appear short lived in most media organisations. Excitement has turned to frustration as one-step forward has been replaced with three steps backwards. In Africa, the problem is acute. The decision-making tables of media organisations remain deprived of women and where there are women, they are surrounded by men.
Few women have followed in the footsteps of Esther Kamweru, the first woman managing editor in Kenya, and indeed sub-Saharan Africa. Today’s standout women editors include Pamela Makotsi-Sittoni (Nation Media Group, Kenya), Barbara Kaija (New Vision, Uganda), Mary Mbewe (Daily Nation, Zambia), Margaret Vuchiri (The Monitor, Uganda), Joyce Shebe (Clouds, Tanzania), Tryphinah Dongwana (Weekend Post, Botswana), Joyce Mhaville (Independent Television -ITV, Tanzania) and Tuma Abdallah (Standard Newspapers,Tanzania). But they remain an exception.
The lack of balance between women and men at the table of decision making has a rollback effect on the content that is produced. A table dominated by men typically makes decisions that benefit men.
So today, International Women’s Day is a grim reminder that things are not rosy in the news business. Achieving gender balance in news and in the structure of media organisations remains a challenge. Unmet, it sees more than half of the population in our countries suffer the consequences of bias, discrimination and sexism.
The business of ignoring the other half of the population can no longer be treated as normal. It’s time that media leaders grasp the challenge, not only because it is the right thing to do, but because it also makes a whole lot of business sense: start covering women, give them space and a voice in news-making and propel them to all levels of decision making within your organisation.
We can no longer afford to imagine that it’s only men who make and sell the news and bring in the shillings to fund the media business. Women too are worthy newsmakers. In all of our societies, there are women holding decision making positions and who are now experts in once male-only domains such as engineers, doctors, scientists and researchers.
They can be deliberately picked out to share their perspectives and expertise and bring balance to the profile of experts quoted on our news pages. Media is the prism through which society sees itself and women are an untapped audience. So, as we celebrate International Women’s Day, let us embrace diversity, which yields better news content and business products, and in so doing eliminate sexism. We know that actions and attitudes that discriminate against people based on their gender is bad for business.
As media, the challenge is ours. We need to consciously embrace and reach the commitments made 26 years ago when the Beijing Platform for Action was signed globally. As the news consuming public, you have a role to play too. Hold your news organization to account and make sure they deliver balanced news that reflects the voices of all of society.
Jane Godia is a gender development and media expert who serves as the Africa Director of Women in News programme. WOMEN IN NEWS is WAN-IFRA’s ground-breaking programme to increase women’s leadership and voices in the news. It does so by equipping women journalists and editors with the skills, strategies, and support networks to take on greater leadership positions within their media. www.womeninnews.org
The eve of International Women’s Day presents an opportunity for us to think about gender equality and the long and often frustrating march toward societies that are truly equal.
As media, we are uniquely placed to drive forward this reflection and discussion. But while focusing on the challenges of gender in society, we owe it to our staff and the communities we serve to also take a hard look at the obstacles within our own organisations.
I’m talking specifically about the scourge of sexual harassment. It’s likely to have happened in your newsroom. It has likely happened to a member of your team. It happens to all genders but is disproportionately directed at women. It happens in every industry, regardless of country, culture or context. This is because sexual harassment is driven by power, not sex. Wherever you have imbalances in power, you have individuals who are at risk of sexual harassment, and those who abuse this power.
I’ve been sexually harassed. The many journalists and editors, friends and family members who I have spoken to over the years on this subject have also been harassed. Yet it is still hard for leaders to recognize that this could be happening within their newsrooms and boardrooms. Why does it continue to be such a taboo?
Counting the cost of sexual harassment
Sexual harassment is, simply put, bad for business. It can harm your corporate reputation. It is a drain on the productivity of staff and managers. Maintaining and building trust in your brand is an absolute imperative for media organisations globally. If and when a case gets out of control or is badly handled – this can directly impact your bottom line.
It is for this reason that WAN-IFRA Women in News has put eliminating sexual harassment as a top priority in our work around gender equality in the media sector. This might seem at odds with the current climate where social interactions are fewer and remote work scenarios are in place in many newsrooms and businesses. But one only needs to tune into the news to know that the abuse of power, manifested as verbal, physical or online harassment, is alive and well.
Preliminary results from an ongoing Women in News research study into the issue of sexual harassment polling hundreds of journalists in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia indicate that more than 1 in 3 women media professionals have been physically harassed, and just under 50% have been verbally harassed. Just over 15% of men in African newsrooms reported being physically harassed, and slightly less than 1 in 4 reports being verbally harassed. The numbers for male media professionals in Southeast Asia are slightly higher than a quarter on both forms of harassment.
The first step in confronting sexual harassment is to talk about it. We need to strip away the stigma and discomfort around having open conversations about what sexual harassment is and isn’t. Media managers, it is entirely in your power to create dynamics in your own teams that are free from sexual harassment.
Publishers and CEOs, you set the organisational culture in your media company.
By being vocal in recognising that it happens everywhere, and communicating to your employees that you will not tolerate sexual harassment of any kind, you send a powerful message to your teams, and publicly. With these actions, you will help us overcome the legacy of silence around this topic, and in doing so take an important first step to create media environments that truly embrace equality.
Melanie Walker is Executive Director of Media Development of the World Association of News Publishers (WAN-IFRA). She is a creator of Women in News, WAN-IFRA’s ground-breaking programme to increase women’s leadership and voices in the news. It does so by equipping women journalists and editors with the skills, strategies, and support networks to take on greater leadership positions within their media. www.womeninnews.org