The new administration at the ruling Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) is warmed up to the idea of fairness in this year’s elections as state media (BTV, RB and Daily News) is expected to provide equal coverage to political parties in the October general elections.
This comes as the government moves to implement the recommendations by Ombudsman, Augustine Makgonatsotlhe after condemned unfair and profitable coverage by state media with its positive coverage slanting towards the BDP. In addition, the government through the Office of President (OP) wants to practice the new broadcasting law which seeks to level the political playing field. The Botswana Regulatory Authority (BOCRA) in 2017 tightened broadcasting laws and will for the first time regulate state media coverage of election campaigns in a move that is expected to give the opposition a fair fighting chance.
These, observers believe it could work against the BDP which has always used the media as “propaganda machinery” during elections season. The new development has been endorsed by President Mokgweetsi Masisi, who according to insiders have made it clear that he will like to debate with his counterparts; Duma Boko and Ndaba Gaolathe of Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC) and Alliance for Progressives (AP) respectively with electorates watching and or listening.
Masisi has also embraced the need to give all the political players fair airplay in state media. The new broadcasting law was effected consequent to a study by Botswana Institute for Development Policy Analysis (BIDPA) which revealed that a vast space of the broadcasting sector remains unregulated. “The most influential radio media, RB1 and RB2 and BTV are unregulated by BOCRA. Being thus unregulated implies a lack of capacity by BOCRA to exert regulatory discipline on the most influential media, possibly leading to lack of uniformity of standards,” BIDPA research read.
It is said already OP has summoned Mass media leadership for a meeting to discuss how the elections will be covered, with the latest gathering held last month. “But then they (Mass media officials) were told to submit a detailed plan because there are changes on how government wants the elections to be covered. Not only elections in October, but rather the buildup including the debates for candidates in all the 57 constituencies,” said a source close to the developments.
The meetings were called by the Permanent Secretary to the President (PSP) Carter Morupisi to remind the broadcaster of the new changes, says a source. PSP however denies meeting them, “I haven’t met with them about those,” Morupisi said shortly this week when asked about the developments. Going to the last meeting in February, it is said, the broadcasters had already drew a budget as to how much it will cost to cover the elections.
“But the senior government officials objected that saying there is no how they can have a budget without a detailed plan because it is the proposal that informs the budget. So they have been told to bring the plan, thereafter budget will be agreed,” an informant who preferred anonymity said. “The coverage plan has guidelines already as they are told there should not be any bias in the buildup to the elections especially debates and even during the elections period. This was informed by a new regulation from BOCRA and pressure from other stakeholders including Ombudsman,” added the informant this week.
The new Act which seeks to ensure a free and fair election states that, “the Authority shall, in consultation with relevant stakeholders, develop a code of conduct for broadcasting during an election period.” The amended Act and guidelines also aim to restrict political parties from advertising news feeds during elections; restrict the use of foreign news feeds as well as the involvement of foreign governments in election campaigns. The Act states that licensed broadcaster shall not be obliged to broadcast a party-political notice. A licensee shall not broadcast a party-political notice exceeding three minutes for every 60 minutes of a programme.
“A licensee shall broadcast a party-political notice outside an election period. A licensee shall not broadcast any political notice immediately before or after item or current affairs programme. A party political notice shall not include any political-party manifesto content, party slogan or campaign message,” the Act states.
In his report to the accusations directed to Btv biasness, Makgonatsotlhe stated that indeed Btv has been giving the ruling party an undue advantage by their unbalanced coverage of political party activities and the documents (Btv mandate and editorial guidelines) provided by the respondents (Btv management) clearly supports the claim. He observed that it resulted in injustice to other political parties and those with an interest in Botswana’s political sphere as they were denied the opportunity to compete fairly with the ruling party.
The report followed a complaint filed with the public protector’s office by Botswana National Front (BNF) Vice President Dr Rev Prince Dibeela. Makgonatsotlhe added that Btv’s coverage of political party activities does not meet the requirements of balance, equity and inclusiveness as set out under mandate and guidelines. He says such needs to be corrected in order for Btv to play its role properly and effectively. In terms of percentages, he says 82 percent coverage is for the BDP while 18 percent is for the combined opposition.
Despite all the recommendations, by far, BDP is still getting a better coverage on state media in the buildup to the elections. However this could now be water under bridge if after the implementation of new BOCRA regulations. In the last elections in 2014, BDP decided not to take part in the Gabz FM organized debates a move that was criticized by political observers saying it was opportunity for the party to clear some policies.
Minister of Presidential Affairs, Governance and Public Administration, Kabo Morwaeng together with Permanent Secretary to the President (PSP) Elias Magosi, this week refused to name and shame the worst performing Ministries and to disclose the best performing Ministries since beginning of 12th parliament including the main reasons for underperformance.
Of late there have been a litany of complaints from both ends of the aisle with cabinet members accused of providing parliament with unsatisfactory responses to the questions posed. In fact for some Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) backbenchers a meeting with the ministers and party leadership is overdue to address their complaints. Jwaneng-Mabutsane MP, Mephato Reatile is also not happy with ministers’ performance.
Bokamoso Private Hospital is battling a P10 million legal suit for a botched fibroids operation which resulted in a woman losing an entire womb and her prospects of bearing children left at zero.
The same suit has also befallen the Attorney General of Botswana who is representing the Ministry of Health and Wellness for their contributory negligence of having the unlawful removal of a patient, Goitsemang Magetse’s womb.
According to the court papers, Magetse says that sometimes in November 2019, she was diagnosed with fibroids at Marina Hospital where upon she was referred to Bokamoso Private Hospital to schedule an appointment for an operation to remove the fibroids, which she did.
Magetse continues that at the instance of one Dr Li Wang, the surgeon who performed the operation, and unknown to her, an operation to remove her whole womb was conducted instead. According to Magetse, it was only through a Marina Hospital regular check-up that she got to learn that her whole womb has been removed.
“At the while she was under the belief that only her fibroids have been removed. By doing so, the hospital has subjected itself to some serious delictual liability in that it performed a serious and life changing operation on patient who was under the belief that she was doing a completely different operation altogether. It thus came as a shock when our client learnt that her womb had been removed, without her consent,” said Magetse’s legal representatives, Kanjabanga and Associates in their summons.
The letter further says, “this is an infringement of our client‘s rights and this infringement has dire consequences on her to the extent that she can never bear children again”. ‘It is our instruction therefore, to claim as we hereby do, damages in the sum of BWP 10,000,000 (ten million Pula) for unlawful removal of client’s womb,” reads Kanjabanga Attorneys’ papers. The defendants are yet to respond to the plaintiff’s papers.
What are fibroids?
Fibroids are tumors made of smooth muscle cells and fibrous connective tissue. They develop in the uterus. It is estimated that 70 to 80 percent of women will develop fibroids in their lifetime — however, not everyone will develop symptoms or require treatment.
The most important characteristic of fibroids is that they’re almost always benign, or noncancerous. That said, some fibroids begin as cancer — but benign fibroids can’t become cancer. Cancerous fibroids are very rare. Because of this fact, it’s reasonable for women without symptoms to opt for observation rather than treatment.
Studies show that fibroids grow at different rates, even when a woman has more than one. They can range from the size of a pea to (occasionally) the size of a watermelon. Even if fibroids grow that large, we offer timely and effective treatment to provide relief.
The Alliance for Progressives (AP) President Ndaba Gaolathe has said that despite major accolades that Botswana continues to receive internationally with regard to the state of economy, the prospects for the future are imperilled.
Delivering his party Annual Policy Statement on Thursday, Gaolathe indicated that Botswana is in a state of do or die, and that the country’s economy is on a sick bed. With a major concern for poverty, Gaolathe pointed out that almost half of Botswana’s people are ravaged by or are about to sink into poverty. “Our young people have lost the fire to dream about what they could become,” he said.